Appium vs Maestro: open-source mobile automation tools compared
Metrics as of , from the GitHub or GitLab API of each repository. Refreshed monthly.
Summary
Appium: WebDriver-based automation framework for mobile, desktop and IoT apps, extended through platform drivers, client libraries and plugins.
Maestro: Framework for UI and end-to-end testing of Android, iOS and web apps using YAML flows.
Both are listed under Mobile automation. The table gives repository metrics from the GitHub API with their fetch date, then the documented facts used for every comparison in this category, each linked to the README or docs page it comes from. A cell reads "not documented" when the fact was not found in the project's documentation (2 of 14 fact cells here); that does not mean the feature is absent.
Side by side
| Fact | Appium | Maestro |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,9961 | 15,7521 |
| Forks | 6,2891 | 9661 |
| Contributors | 4221 | 1211 |
| Last release | 2026-08-241 | 2026-08-311 |
| Last commit | 2026-09-221 | 2026-09-181 |
| Commits in 90 days | 2741 | 971 |
| License | Apache-2.01 | Apache-2.01 |
| Primary language | TypeScript1 | Kotlin1 |
| Status | active1 | active1 |
| Languages for writing tests | Official clients for Java, Python, Ruby and .NET C#; third-party clients for other languages source: README | YAML flow files source: README |
| Mobile platforms | iOS, Android, macOS, Windows and other platforms through drivers; native, hybrid, mobile web and desktop apps source: README | Android, iOS and web on emulators, simulators, browsers and physical Android devices source: README |
| Test authoring format | Code, through WebDriver client libraries source: README | YAML commands such as launchApp, tapOn, assertVisible; visual flow building in Maestro Studio source: README |
| Parallel or distributed execution | Parallel server processes and parallel driver sessions in one server process source: README | CLI sharding across connected devices (--shards, --shard-split, --shard-all) source: Docs: Maestro CLI commands and options |
| CI integration | not documentednot found in the project's documentation as of | Report formats for Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Azure DevOps source: Docs: Test reports and artifacts |
| Report formats | not documentednot found in the project's documentation as of | JUnit XML, HTML, HTML detailed (--format flag) source: Docs: Test reports and artifacts |
| Install method | npm (npm i -g appium), then drivers with appium driver install source: README | Install script (curl -fsSL "https://get.maestro.mobile.dev" | bash); requires Java 17 or higher source: README |
1 Fetched from the GitHub or GitLab API on . Hover a value for its own date.
When each fits
Written from each project's documented scope, not from preference. Neither tool is ranked.
Appium
Fits projects that automate native, hybrid, mobile web and desktop apps across platforms through WebDriver; its README describes one or more drivers per platform that know how to automate it. source: README
Maestro
Fits projects that run UI and end-to-end tests for Android, iOS and web apps; its README describes tests kept as a flat list of YAML commands. source: README
More on these tools
Sources
- GitHub REST API: repository, read
- GitHub REST API: repository, read
- GitHub REST API: contributors, read
- GitHub REST API: contributors, read
- GitHub REST API: latest release, read
- GitHub REST API: latest release, read
- GitHub REST API: commits, read
- GitHub REST API: commits, read
- README, read
- README, read
- Docs: Maestro CLI commands and options, read
- Docs: Test reports and artifacts, read
Documented facts collected 2026-09-22. See the methodology for how metrics and facts are gathered.