Hurl vs Karate: open-source API testing tools compared
Metrics as of , from the GitHub or GitLab API of each repository. Refreshed monthly.
Summary
Hurl: Command line tool that runs and tests HTTP requests written in a plain text format.
Karate: Test automation framework for API, UI and performance tests and mocks, written as feature files.
Both are listed under API testing. The table gives repository metrics from the GitHub API with their fetch date, then the documented facts used for every comparison in this category, each linked to the README or docs page it comes from. A cell reads "not documented" when the fact was not found in the project's documentation; that does not mean the feature is absent.
Side by side
| Fact | Hurl | Karate |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,2101 | 8,9651 |
| Forks | 7451 | 2,0421 |
| Contributors | 971 | 1741 |
| Last release | 2026-04-291 | 2026-08-141 |
| Last commit | 2026-09-211 | 2026-09-191 |
| Commits in 90 days | 1631 | 4601 |
| License | Apache-2.01 | MIT1 |
| Primary language | Rust1 | Java1 |
| Status | active1 | active1 |
| Protocols | HTTP: REST, SOAP and GraphQL APIs, HTML content, XML and JSON based APIs source: README | REST over HTTP, GraphQL, SOAP, WebSocket source: Docs: Why Karate? |
| Test authoring format | Plain text Hurl files that define HTTP requests and asserts source: README | Plain-text feature files with Karate keywords source: Docs: Why Karate? |
| Languages for writing tests | Hurl plain text file format source: README | Karate DSL with Gherkin-based syntax source: Docs: Why Karate? |
| Parallel or distributed execution | --parallel runs each file in its own worker thread; --jobs sets the number of parallel jobs source: README | Parallel runner using Java 21+ virtual threads; features and scenarios run in parallel source: Docs: Parallel Execution |
| CI integration | CI/CD tutorial with GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD examples source: Docs: CI/CD Integration | CI/CD guide with a GitHub Actions reference workflow source: Docs: CI/CD |
| Report formats | HTML, JSON, JUnit, TAP source: README | HTML (default), JUnit XML, Cucumber JSON source: Docs: Parallel Execution |
| Install method | Binaries; Homebrew, Chocolatey, Scoop, winget, cargo, conda-forge, npm, Docker image ghcr.io/orange-opensource/hurl source: README | VS Code extension, Karate CLI, Maven, Gradle or standalone JAR source: Docs: Quick Start |
1 Fetched from the GitHub or GitLab API on . Hover a value for its own date.
When each fits
Written from each project's documented scope, not from preference. Neither tool is ranked.
Hurl
Fits projects that run and test HTTP requests defined in plain text files from the command line; its README describes chaining requests, capturing values and evaluating queries on response headers and body. source: README
Karate
Fits projects that test APIs, mocks, performance and web UIs with one tool; its README describes one framework that combines API testing, mocks, performance testing and UI automation. source: README
More on these tools
Sources
- GitHub REST API: repository, read
- GitHub REST API: repository, read
- GitHub REST API: contributors, read
- GitHub REST API: contributors, read
- GitHub REST API: latest release, read
- GitHub REST API: latest release, read
- GitHub REST API: commits, read
- GitHub REST API: commits, read
- README, read
- Docs: Why Karate?, read
- Docs: Parallel Execution, read
- Docs: CI/CD Integration, read
- Docs: CI/CD, read
- Docs: Quick Start, read
- README, read
Documented facts collected 2026-09-22. See the methodology for how metrics and facts are gathered.